This dress is beautiful and I have had the picture saved on my computer for several years. It is from a University of Virginia website where the costume design students write a page about a vintage clothing item. The website is really helpful because she is analyzing the construction of the dress, which gives me a really clear idea of how I could copy it. This dress is a silk chiffon dress from the 1940s with a basket-weave bodice and a beautiful drapey skirt.
Image from here. |
While the dress is yellowed, it originally was dyed in very light pastels, which you can see if you look closely. It explains that the bodice is fully lined and boned and the back dips 4 inches lower than the center front.. I really think the basket-weave effect is beautiful and wouldn't be very difficult to re-create.
The skirt is fully lined with a band of crinoline at the bottom. The skirt is made of 12 bias-cut triangles of silk chiffon. The real drawback for this one is that chiffon is a pain to hem and I quote "The skirt itself is cut from twelve, bias cut triangles of the various colored chiffons, each gathered at the top and measuring roughly 120" at the bottom. Thus, the bottom width of the chiffon overskirt is over 1440", or 120 feet, or 40 yards--nearly half a football field in length."
Haha, my mom just started laughing hysterically when I told her that. I agree, I don't know how I would hem 120 feet of chiffon without going insane and hulk-smashing everything in sight... but the dress is so BEAUTIFUL and looks so wedding-dress-y. It would be a flattering style!
DRESS 2:
I found this dress reading Rebecca's blog. She wrote a post about how McCalls should start offering reprints of some of its vintage patterns and this was one of her examples. It's a 1949 McCall dress featured as the bridesmaid dress to 7500.
Image from here. |
Look, I made a poll! Enjoy and leave me comments on what you think!!!
I vote for the McCalls pattern, but I may be a bit baised, lol. Someone has the pic of the front posted on Flickr as well, but alas, no pic of the back of the envelope. It's a bit of a stretch, but maybe you could email or call McCalls and see if they could help. :]
ReplyDeleteI voted for the McCall's, although I do love the basket-weave dress too - I just think all that chiffon would drive you mad :) Also, I looked up McCall's 7500 & I almost died of delight. Why are modern wedding gowns so... strapless & ew? BORING.
ReplyDeleteEspecially the ones that are a boned corset with a sheer midriff! Gag.
DeleteI like them both, but I think the McCall's dress is more elegant. I love love love the style lines! The drape of the back is beautiful.
ReplyDeleteI love the basket weave dress...maybe you could gather some friends that sew and have a hemming party.
ReplyDeleteI of course like both and think whichever one you choose will be perfect but I do really like the braided chiffon, it is so unique and would be so light and airy. I voted for both and voted for the braided chiffon 2x!
ReplyDeleteGosh, the McCall pattern is just stunning...I can really see you in it!!!
ReplyDeleteOmg LOVE that last one! Wowee!!
ReplyDelete120 feet is A LOT. But if it's a wedding dress... It's worth the extra effort, no?
ReplyDeleteThe basket weave is gorgeous but I also love scallops.
I think the basket weave is very nice. But, I have always thought simpler wedding gowns are more flattering. The McCalls dress is so graceful. It's a winner, big time.
ReplyDeleteThe McCalls dress - keep a search on ebay, and I bet it shows up. I have had a pattern show up 2 years after I put it on a search! Just remember to renew the search when it asks you to...Good luck!
ReplyDeleteYour dress is awesome. I'd go for lots of pearls on the celebrity dresses neck and arm with lacy sandals or wedges. So much you could do with it. A lovely belt would be pretty too. I would http://www.vicyc.com/vintage-wedding-dresses-c-30.html suggest a pretty lace cami underneath just to keep it 'appropriate'
ReplyDelete